Welcome to the Factr Blog!
The blog includes how different Factr members use the platform for their projects, work, and even connecting with family.
Interested in sharing your Factr experience on the blog?
Email sarah@factr.com or click the chat button in the bottom right (if you're logged in).
Enjoy the creative uses each member has found for Factr! We hope they support in inspiring you and focusing on what matters.
Bringing Halloween to life on Factr
Timothy Weber
October 31, 2019
The Factr team connected with member, Timothy Weber, on his most recent endeavor, a Halloween project centered around the creation of a skull whose eyes followed movement. We asked questions regarding his project and the role Factr played in bringing it to fruition. This conversation took place approximately midway through the project which has since been completed, successfully spooking unknowing trick-or-treaters on Halloween!
Q: Why did you decide to back Factr on Kickstarter?
A: Factr initially caught my eye on Kickstarter because I’ve been thinking critically about social media for several years now, and more particularly since I worked at a computer security company. The political, social, and cultural effects of the current crop of popular platforms and apps seem substantially negative to me. So I was already asking “What would an ethical social media site look like?” And I’d already come to the same preliminary conclusion that I saw in Factr’s Kickstarter--that a free service, paid for by advertising, has inherent limitations, and charging a small fee is a more ethical and practical model that focuses the platform on valuing your attention instead of on commoditizing it.
What I didn’t know was how Factr envisioned their product working. When I saw the beta, I liked the design--it seemed easy to use and the concept set was clear, and I could easily see how to use it. But I wasn’t sure why I wanted to use it. It seemed clearly useful to people who need to collect a lot of links about a topic, but I don’t often do that.
So, I wanted to get to know Factr in more depth and to do that I’d have to really use it for something. I was about to start a new spare-time electronics project, a skull with glowing eyes for Halloween, and I realized that I do collect links to reference data about such projects, which I usually keep in a bunch of browser tabs while I’m working on them. That’s pretty awkward and makes switching to a different computer a bit hard! So, I figured I’d store the links in a Factr stream, so I could look at them from there when I needed them. Then I realized I could make the stream public and use it as a Work In Progress blog as well.
Q: Where are you at with your skull project?
A: As I'm writing, I’m waiting for a ten-hour 3D print to finish. The print contains the skull’s eyes and nose--where all the action happens. The electronics are functional, and I’m generally working on the physical portions now--3D printing, building up the parts and figuring out how to make it hang together as seamlessly as possible (literally and figuratively). I’m getting nervous about the looming deadline!
Q: Has using Factr altered or had an impact on your workflow?
A: Since I made the stream public, I fell into a goal of posting something every time I had a chance to work on my project. I’ve rarely done that for past projects. I think Factr’s informal “the whole stream could be just links” design, plus its solid visual design (making all the content types look good together), felt freeing, like I could post something short or long, visual or textual, and it would all be OK.
Committing to that frequent-posting goal, in turn, has made me focus a bit more on visualization and documentation--I’ve taken more videos and done more detailed 3D renderings. In some sense, that’s a distraction; I don’t need cool animated GIFs to make a prototype. But it’s also possible that I’m learning from that pre-visualization. For instance, after doing a slick-looking 3D rendering with good light simulation, I realized that the glowing eyes would light the eye sockets, and they, in turn, would reflect off of the front surfaces of the LCD displays. Knowing about that potential problem earlier helps me think about ways to solve it.
Q: Can you share the process of your project (beginning-middle-end)?
A: That kind of iterative problem-solving is central to designing a new electronic gadget. There are always new discoveries and unanticipated consequences of combining things in a certain way. That’s why I generally try to tackle the riskiest things first. In this case, I wasn’t sure the thermal camera would really be usable to direct the eyes; would it be too slow? Too narrow? Not sensitive enough? There were plenty of things that could go wrong. So, I got that working before anything else. My next big question is, will it work well outside at night? That’s why my next step is to get the whole physical object ready to test, as simply as possible.
Q: What have you enjoyed most about using Factr?
A: I've enjoyed the way that Factr seems to get out of the way during this process. I can easily post something at the end of a work session, even though my brain is mostly fried by that point. Then I can share the stream with someone else, and they don’t need to make an account or learn any terminology or even be aware that they’re using a new social media site. And when I’m telling friends what I’m working on, I can easily bring the stream up on my phone and show the latest images.
In that past, I’ve wondered about publicly documenting these kinds of personal projects. On the one hand, it brings some feedback and some enjoyable attention. On the other, it takes time. Sometimes it seems like it takes as long to document a project as to do it--which means if I didn’t share my projects publicly, I could do twice as many!
But this time, with Factr, I don’t feel like it’s cost me a huge amount of time to do that documentation. And it’s been fun and rewarding to post more detailed progress to Factr. So maybe Factr is improving my whole process!
Ask me again, though, after Halloween, when we see how much I was able to finish in time--and wish me luck! Five hundred trick-or-treaters constitute a very hard deadline.
Research like a journalist
Michael Fleshman
September 10, 2019
My association with Factr goes back to its infancy, when I was drafted to test the functionality and user-friendliness of the software as it evolved from a newsreader-with-potential into the feature-rich social media platform it is rapidly becoming. Being “of a certain age,” I also served as a canary in the digital mine shaft – alerting the engineers to features too complex for people with only “conversational” tech skills, and suggesting new ones.
In my work life, I’ve made a career as a New York-based human-rights activist, policy analyst, and development journalist specializing in sub-Saharan Africa. Africa is a big, diverse place, and, as a practical matter, my profession requires me to follow events on a large number of topics and countries – from music and art to counterinsurgency, economic development, and Africa’s international relations. In the pre-digital age, reliable, timely news and in-depth information about Africa was scarce and difficult to get, requiring hours reading many newspapers daily, regular visits to the library to peruse African periodicals (which often arrived weeks or months late), or slogging through the UN’s byzantine document-cataloging system to find hard copies of relevant reports.
The advent of the web solved the access problem for me but created another: how to monitor and filter the mountain of information now available in real time to find what I needed? I was overwhelmed by the task of managing the data glut and frustrated that commercially available newsreaders and services like Google Alerts were only adding to the clutter – generating a lot of extraneous and off-topic material no matter how much I tinkered with the search terms. I spent hours surfing the web looking for relevant news and information.
Factr changes all that – and, with it, the way I do my research. With powerful search, filtering, and aggregation tools built around the core idea of an information “stream,” I've been able to automate much of my monitoring of the many places and issues I follow. Creating a stream is a straightforward process: decide on the topic you want to follow, identify your sources, load each of their RSS feeds into the search engine, select your search terms, and voilà! You’re done! Data from your information sources, filtered by your search terms, begins arriving into your stream in chronological order, with duplicates flagged. Factr enables you to then search the stream by keyword or date, aggregate it, tag it, comment on it, and share it as you need to.
I tend to check my streams at least once a week, and on occasion several times a day.
One of the streams I use most, African Energy and Mining Monitor, provides a good illustration of how Factr makes it easy to find the information I need when I need it. I wanted a stream to track, in real-time, industrial, marketing and financing, and sociopolitical developments in the critical sub-Saharan mining and energy sectors. That posed a problem, since it is often the case that the industry press largely ignores social and political aspects, while social justice sources rarely cover business and finance. Factr allowed me to simply combine those different sources into a single information stream, and then search that data by subject, location, and time.
I spent a couple of hours locating and loading about thirty sources and setting the filtering terms. Then Factr immediately started populating the stream. Over time, I’ve almost doubled my source list and tweaked my search terms a couple of times to improve the quality of the stream. I have been very happy with the results.
Using Factr, you’ll invest time on the front end – identifying and loading your RSS sources and setting your search terms. But, at this point, I can set up a basic stream in a matter of minutes when I’m working with only a few sources and using simple search terms. Other streams, with lots of sources and filters, take longer to set up. Yet, even the streams I've set up on the fly consistently deliver more relevant data than anything else I’ve tried. In any case, the sources and filters are easy to tweak – by adding new ones or removing unproductive ones to improve the depth and quality of my data.
Factr also allows you to use the same source list to build other streams with different search terms, combine your stream with the streams of colleagues, or add editors and admins for collaborative projects. With its social media features now coming online, the platform will soon allow journalists and researchers, advocacy groups and project teams, regional specialists, and governmental and non-governmental organizations to build a collaborative and interactive information environment whose content that can be debated, analyzed, and evaluated by their peers in real-time. What’s not to like?
So, who should use Factr? The short answer, in my humble opinion, is everybody, because my experience with Factr has been so positive. It is particularly useful for people trying to manage large information flows from multiple sources, and to be able to share them with friends and colleagues.
Or, you can collect cute kitten videos and rainbow unicorn sightings. Whatever floats your boat. Part of Factr’s value for me is its great versatility.
One of Factr’s other winning features is its strong privacy safeguards and its rejection of ads and surveillance capitalism. When I use Factr, instead of, say, Chrome to do research, I'm not bombarded by ads. I'm not worried about being tracked. I'm not concerned that somebody out there is trying to winnow out my personal details, identify my friends and colleagues, and sell my online life to the highest bidder.
For my money, Mark Zuckerberg should be given a fair trial, then drawn and quartered with extreme prejudice. Until that happy day arrives, Factr’s user-controlled platform, its innovative and powerful data collection and management tools, and its efficiency and flexibility make it a great addition to my professional toolkit.
Gathering the Occult
Kevely Ferreira
August 30, 2019
For over a year now, I’ve been drawn toward all matters of the occult and spirituality--from astrology to divination to, currently, studying the cultural roots and anthropologies of ancient civilizations. My findings and understandings have come from a handful of books and literary pieces, but mostly from diving into the abyss that is the internet.
My internet searches would force me to leap from page to page in order to research content, and I could only bookmark the website for future reference. But bookmarking wasn’t an efficient method either, unless I wanted to have dozens of bookmarks for topics of such a broad spectrum. Since I was learning, I also wanted to organize my thoughts into one collective medium, as a way to revisit my findings and notes, especially since one source could be parallel to another. I considered using a journal to store the data I was gathering, but realized a journal could easily become disorganized and incoherent, since my research was too scattered for the organizational limitations that paper poses.
I needed a platform that allowed me to store all my findings--images, videos, links, my own interpretations in one space that I could refer back to and investigate further. I also needed the versatility and flexibility to curate my findings into subcategories, so that my research and mental flow could be organized and concise, regardless of the number of branches that a topic like spirituality has. I needed a platform that was easy to use, and that helped me manage my time and the information I was building upon, while also being accessible to my friends if I wanted to share content.
With Factr, I’m able to break through all those virtual and concrete limitations. By starting a stream for my findings, I can post and organize a system of content and links efficiently and without hassle. Features like activity options, folders, and hashtags make it easy to access everything and anything simply based on category. In addition, I can include my voice and thoughts in all the content I post, as well as links and images, without having to worry about the minimal character limit that most social media platforms place.
Joining Factr made me realize that I wanted to keep my content more exclusive than what most social platforms allowed. At first, I needed to have an outlet to curate all of my research in one medium, but I began to want to share this content with my friends who also were interested in spiritualism--specifically those who were at the very beginning of their journey. I wanted to have a safe network for myself and my friends, without too many prying eyes, especially since esoteric knowledge is so controversial with the broader public.
Along with enabling me to curate my content, Factr allows me to curate my stream’s audience. I have complete control over who I want to share access with--the general public or specific individuals, based on direct invitation. I can also control the type of access people have to my stream--whether they will be a viewer, contributor, editor, or administrator to the stream. This feature will allow me to expand my network letting others post content collaboratively, and it will make the stream as a whole much more knowledge-filled and diverse.
Factr for freelance writers
Sheerly Avni
May 7, 2019
I am a freelance writer, editor, and story/script consultant. Almost everything about my job(s) involves collaborating and researching online. When things are going well, I’m usually balancing about five different projects on vastly disparate topics. Which leaves me especially vulnerable to internet quicksand.
Like most writers, while balancing several jobs, I’d also rather be doing just about anything in the world than writing, so I’m always happy to jump into an argument with trolls on twitter, an ex-boyfriend search on Facebook, or an envy-cruise through Instagram. Anything to avoid, you know, work.
Social media thrives on hijacking our attention. And as with most of us, my attention is my livelihood; if I can’t focus, I can’t earn.
This is where Factr came in for me. I started using it about eight months ago: and it’s made a huge difference in helping me streamline and discipline my research. And by “huge difference,” I mean saving me approximately a thousand dollars a week in wasted productivity.
Here’s why: back in 2017 I invested in an app that would send me reports on how much time I was spending on social media. The figure came to a whopping 4.7 hours a day. Based on how much I earn per hour as a full-time freelancer, that’s about three hundred dollars of wasted work time a day, before taxes. After taxes, a minimum of a thousand dollars a week. And I’m calculating that figure based purely on wasted work hours, not on all that fun psychological damage and self-loathing that we already know is brought about by spending time on social media.
I used to think the problem was my lack of willpower, but that was before I took an assignment that required me to do research on just how much money Facebook, Google, and Twitter spend on designing for “engagement” (i.e., keeping us online and freaked out).
But, no, I am no match for the teams of neuroscientists, graphic designers, and data analysts that those multi-billion dollar empires pay to keep my attention where they want it, rather than where_ I_ want it. Statistically, none of us are, which is why they are all so hugely successful.
Factr can’t give me willpower, but it _can _minimize my exposure to search sinkholes: I now block Google, Facebook, and Twitter during the workday, and I still get research done on all the subjects I’m required to track for the various new projects I get assigned. It takes about ten minutes for me to set up an aggregated stream that enables the platform to do my research for me, pulling only the information I need, from the sources I trust. Which means that over the past eight months, I’ve been able to set parameters that make Factr find the information I’ve needed to prep for work I’ve had to do around the following wide-ranging topics:
- The lives of undocumented immigrants post-deportation
- Arguments and counterarguments in favor of the legalization of marijuana
- Israeli-funded Palestinian documentaries
- Mexico City socialites of the early 80s
- Sexual harassment in the Latin American film industry
- Recent disruptive innovations in the silicon wafer-cutting industry (I know, right?)
- Training tips for multiple-dog households
- The history of Afro-Futurist cinema
- Recent sex and rape scandals of Catholic priests throughout the Western Hemisphere
- U.S. military involvement in the early days of the internet
- 21st century anti-activist surveillance tech
- And…obviously, Wonder Woman
Although I love to follow other people’s streams, like The Trouble with Big Tech and Science Fiction, both for work and for fun, I actually prefer to keep my own research streams private. I love the fact that this particular platform makes it so easy to do that, while also giving me the option to share them with individual people or with the public, should I so desire.
My favorite stream, however, is just a pure testament to my own reportorial narcissism. It’s called Lightbulbs, and it is exactly what it sounds like. Whenever I come up with an idea for one piece while working on another, or while messaging with friends, or while watching Veep for the gazillionth time, I simply jot them down in my stream. I label those jottings as I go, and sometimes they even organize into something vaguely resembling a first draft.
My job also involves tons of interview recordings and voice messages. The ability to upload those into my streams and keep everything in one place is especially useful for me. It gives me peace of mind, to know that I have the necessary documentation-- in case I am challenged by an irate source or subject.
Speaking of peace of mind, Factr hasn’t made me a productivity guru or even a productivity apprentice. I _still _waste an embarrassing amount of time, earning potential, and mental health on the mind-eating goblin that the web has become. The difference is that the virtual space I now use to compose, research, and reinforce is not designed to wreak havoc on my attention and concentration.
Updating the family scrapbook
Deborah Grossman
May 7, 2019
My cousin Miriam and I have always been the genealogy geeks of the family, independently finding and sharing little bits of our family history as we discover them. Miriam, a graphic designer by trade, even made a photographic family tree at one point, as well as publishing a booklet of her mother’s story about the tiny Russian village she and my grandmother (and their five other siblings) grew up in.
Over the years, we’ve had countless emails between us, sharing photos, answering questions, sharing links to articles. I have a copy of the booklet and photographic family tree and many, many family photos, going back to my great-grandparents in their youth. I’ve done some research on Ancestry.com and JewishGen and I’ve saved and printed census documents, ships’ manifests, marriage license applications, and saved screenshots of written histories. The documents, photos, and links are all over the place. And while some of those sites allow you to save documents into files within the site, they’re not easy to share.
My Factr stream “Grossman Family Photos” collects all of those bits and pieces, scraps of paper, and links in one place. I went back through my emails with Miriam to collect the links to articles about a particular street on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, where my great-grandfather lived for a while when he first came to the United States. I added the links as posts to the stream. I posted a link to the digital copy of my great-aunt’s memoir booklet. There are links to articles about the history of the village that the Pilchman family came from. The links appear as distinct posts, with editable images, titles, and descriptions—clean and clear.
I posted a photo of my grandmother on her wedding day on the stream. I was looking at the photo and wondering about her attire, wondering what year she married my grandfather. I know from the 1930 census (a photo of that census page, describing the members of the Pilchman household, is also on the stream) that my grandmother still lived with her parents. I know what year my father was born, after my grandparents were married, but I didn’t know the year of the wedding. So I went looking for the New Jersey Marriage Index, and once I located it, I was able to find the year my grandmother AND her sister (Miriam’s mother) married, and post a photo of the marriage index page on the stream. Using the Factr browser extension makes that easy. I can save any page to my stream while I’m on that page. (See article “How to Install Factr’s browser extension for Chrome”).
With Factr, I’ve been able to start sharing and combining all of our joint research. I recently learned that my cousin has original documents I’ve never seen (the visa application form that my great-grandfather submitted to bring my great-grandmother and the seven children to the U.S.; the embarkation cards for the ship they sailed on). Those items are now part of the stream.
I’ve realized I can use Factr for all sorts of joint research projects. For a more general project, we could create a public stream. For the genealogy project, we can create a group that encompasses more members of our family and create other family streams to share with them (photos, artifacts, informational writings).
I chose Factr for this project, rather than, say a private group on Facebook, for a number of reasons. One of my friends has a group on Facebook sharing his family history. He’s invited all the members of the family line to join his private group, which is open only to the family (and a few honorary members), but he doesn’t really have control over the information, nor the group, other than determining who is invited to join. It becomes much more conversational and ragged (and impossible to search). On Factr, I can determine the order in which the posts the appear, I can easily edit the posts, including dates. I can invite people to be viewers, contributors, editors, or administrators--I can share, while still maintaining control of the stream content. The members of the stream can still have conversations about the content—there is a comment feature under every post—but it can’t go off the rails like other comments sections. Even better, the information is not shared with anyone you don’t want to share with. I’ll never see an ad for Ancestry.com pop up in my Pilchman Family stream.
I’ve been casually gathering genealogical information for years now. I’ve had information scattered to a lot of places--old-school paper files, digital files, in my “shoebox” on Ancestry, and in emails. Now I’ve put all those pieces of information in one place. As I continue to fine tune my family genealogy stream, I’ll put the entries into chronological order and edit the captions and descriptions to be more uniform. I’ll tag them so I can I can filter for information about specific family members.
But the big achievement so far is this: I’ve gathered my file cabinet, my bulletin board, my notes, my shoebox, my photo album, all into one place. It’s been a little like switching to a smartphone from a paper datebook, digital watch, wall calendar, notebook, and alarm clock. Using Factr, I streamlined, collected, and archived my big genealogy project. I’ll continue to work on it in much more manageable, shareable, and enjoyable format.
The Rise of Corporate Censorship
Chris Van der Walt
March 12, 2019
In the last few years, driven by pressure from governments and the public, technology companies have been ramping up censorship on their platforms. Almost overnight, private companies are policing what is opinion and what is propaganda, what is disagreement and what is abuse, who may speak and who should be silenced, without accountability or oversight. In a drive to reign in the chaos of the internet, ad hoc, knee jerk, and heavy-handed approaches have combined to create a dangerous time for free speech and individual rights on the internet.
Many of the measures have been voluntarily adopted by tech companies preemptively to avert government regulation by demonstrating to lawmakers that the they can police their own platforms.
For example, in 2018 Twitter suspended over 70 million accounts and introduced new rules restricting advertising. Youtube is working on new ways to identify ‘authoritative sources’. Whatsapp is now flagging forwarded messages and working with fact checkers. Google announced changes to its search algorithms to “to help surface more authoritative pages and demote low-quality content.” Facebook changed its newsfeed algorithm, hired editors to moderate content and partnered with third-party fact-checking organizations. The company has also teamed up with The Atlantic Council, the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute (NDI) to help them to “to slow the global spread of misinformation that could influence elections”.
In other cases, tech companies are suspending accounts and moderating content due to demands from governments. They are not required to disclose such requests, and while social media and app store platforms have been urged to be fully transparent about how often and why they have complied with takedown requests, the results are mixed.
Because many of the platforms’ moderation policies and community standards are opaque, it is hard for affected people to know why their speech has been curtailed, and what recourse they have to dispute it. Was their account flagged by other users, by the company itself, or by the government?
The lack of accountability can have very real and very negative consequences. Rules against hate speech and inflammatory content have been used to silence women of color, remove images of indigenous peoples, muzzle journalists, and censor images of breastfeeding and childbirth. Arbitrary changes to search algorithms reduced traffic to some alternative news sites overnight by up to 70%. Restrictions on violent imagery have been used to block videos of police brutality. Requests by governments have been used to remove documentation of ethnic cleansing and war atrocities.
What’s to be done?
Censorship is a powerful weapon that can easily be misused, especially when the lines between governments and corporations have become so blurred. As the Electronic Frontier Foundation argues, censorship should be the last resort against hate speech, fraud and online abuse, not the first. Many countries already have defamation laws that could be applied online without infringing the the rights of individuals to engage in public debate. Likewise regulations governing media and publishing could be applied in digital domains. In the US, election laws prohibit foreign governments from using ads to influence support for candidates, require materials distributed by foreign governments to clearly display where they are coming from, and to be filed with the US Attorney General. In many cases, the laws just need to be updated to include online media and subsequently enforced.
Censorship is a political act. Organizations that play fact-checking or moderation roles need to be strictly impartial. Facebook’s partnerships with the IRI, NDI and Atlantic Council have raised concerns because of their partisan affiliations. The first two organizations are explicitly connected with the two dominant US political parties, and the Atlantic Council receives its funding in part from foreign governments and defense contractors. It is legitimate to question whether the political agendas of these organizations might influence the restrictions that they advocate for, especially since their focus with Facebook is specifically on foreign interference in elections.
Accountability and transparency are crucial and sorely lacking in these developments. Companies should be required to disclose which content is being restricted and why. There need to be processes in place to appeal decisions. The Manila Principles provide a framework to protect companies from government overreach while protecting the rights of users on their platforms—ideally these principles should serve as a blueprint for companies and governments moving forward.
Algorithmic decision-making and artificial intelligence are increasingly determining the information diets of billions of people. Evidence is mounting that the social biases of their creators become embedded these systems so it’s imperative that they are subject to independent audits that examine the downstream effects of their use—both intended and unintended.
Better yet, people should be put in charge of their own information flows. Too many decisions about what what is and isn’t important are being taken out of people’s hands by corporate platforms whose primary interest is to serve advertisers. A new generation of platforms, such as Factr, restore control to end users by enabling them to control their own information based on the sources they trust and the filters that are relevant to them. Why use intermediaries whose primary motivation is to mine your data and attention, and resell them for profit to whoever will pay?
Unfortunately, transforming the “censor-first” mentality is a massive challenge. The tech giants fight every effort at regulation with tooth and nail, and they have very deep pockets. Many governments find it very useful to be able to outsource censorship to companies who aren’t as accountable to the public on issues of free speech. Governments who do want to safeguard citizens’ rights find the the legislative complexity of regulating a global industry very challenging (although GDPR has shown that with political will it is possible.) And the speed of technological innovation means governance efforts will always be several steps behind.
That doesn’t mean that we should submit to the status quo, however. As end users of these systems, we have an important role to play in shaping the future of the internet we inhabit. Our decisions about the tools we choose to adopt, and the compromises we are willing to accept will ultimately play a massive role in the services that companies provide.
Every day we discover more of the hidden costs of these technologies. We need to demand solutions that protect our rights to free thought and to free speech—instead of entrusting them to the powerful and unscrupulous. They have proven unworthy of our trust.